MOST Analysis

Mission Statement

The Scrum framework is in itself a complete system and there is very little scope to change the basic elements of this framework. However, Scrum being a framework only provides the structure and some of the finer details can be decided upon by the internal teams. It does not necessarily have to tamper with the framework but rather find ways to implement it better by doing things a little differently. For example, the organization has the liberty to choose the Scrum Team. To ensure better implementation of Scrum, the Team should have some familiarity with Scrum as well as the transformation project undertaken. Another important step in fine-tuning the Scrum implementation in an organization is regularly revisiting the project’s goals and objectives and updating the Product Backlog. Daily Stand-up Meeting must be held with the Scrum Team to share updates on the progress and any hurdles faced in the execution of Scrum. Review and retrospection are also crucial to fine-tuning the Scrum framework. The deliverable of every sprint must be reviewed and the progress of the overall project needs to be measured regularly as well. To ensure that the Scrum implementation is on track, it is important to document all the inputs received during the daily and sprint review meetings. These discussions may often lead to suggestions on actionable improvements from the team members of stakeholders and these should be considered for application. It is also important to retrospect and document all the lessons learned during a project, which can be helpful in future projects.

---

Objectives

01. Prioritize Fine-Tuning Initiatives: departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development. Time Allocated: 1 Month
02. Experiment & Iterate: departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development. Time Allocated: 1 Month
03. Monitor Progress and Results: departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development. Time Allocated: 1 Month
04. Adapt and Evolve: departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development. Time Allocated: 1 Month
05. Celebrate Successes and Learn from Failures: departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development. Time Allocated: 1 Month

---

Strategies

01. Prioritize Fine-Tuning Initiatives: Each individual department head to undertake departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development.
02. Experiment & Iterate: Each individual department head to undertake departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development.
03. Monitor Progress and Results: Each individual department head to undertake departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development.
04. Adapt and Evolve: Each individual department head to undertake departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development.
05. Celebrate Successes and Learn from Failures: Each individual department head to undertake departmental SWOT analysis; strategy research & development.

---

Tasks

01. Create a task on your calendar, to be completed within the next month, to analyze Prioritize Fine-Tuning Initiatives.
02. Create a task on your calendar, to be completed within the next month, to analyze Experiment & Iterate.
03. Create a task on your calendar, to be completed within the next month, to analyze Monitor Progress and Results.
04. Create a task on your calendar, to be completed within the next month, to analyze Adapt and Evolve.
05. Create a task on your calendar, to be completed within the next month, to analyze Celebrate Successes and Learn from Failures.

---

Introduction

What is Fine-Tuning?

Fine-tuning, in the context of machine learning, refers to the process of taking a pre-trained model and further training it on a specific task or dataset to improve its performance for that particular task. It is a common technique used in transfer learning, where knowledge gained from solving one problem is applied to a different but related problem.

The process of fine-tuning involves several steps:

1. Pre-training: Initially, a large-scale model is trained on a vast and diverse dataset to learn general patterns and representations of language, images, or other data types. This pre-training phase is resource-intensive and requires a substantial amount of data and computation.

2. Task-specific Dataset: After pre-training, the model is still a general-purpose model and not optimized for any specific task. To make it more task-specific, fine-tuning requires a smaller, task-specific dataset that is labelled or annotated for the target task.

3. Freezing Pre-trained Layers: During fine-tuning, the early layers of the pre-trained model, which have learned general representations, are often frozen. These layers are assumed to be generally applicable to the target task and do not require further modification.

4. Training on Task-specific Data: The later layers of the pre-trained model (closer to the output) are unfrozen, and the model is further trained on the task-specific dataset. By using this smaller dataset, the model can adapt its weights to better perform the target task.

5. Hyperparameter Tuning: Fine-tuning may also involve adjusting hyperparameters (e.g., learning rate, batch size, etc.) specific to the target task to achieve optimal performance.

Fine-tuning is particularly useful when you have a limited amount of data for your specific task but have access to a pre-trained model on a related task that has been trained on a large dataset. By leveraging the knowledge from the pre-trained model, you can achieve better performance on the target task with fewer computational resources and data compared to training a model from scratch. Fine-tuning is commonly used in natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, and other machine learning domains.

---

Fine-Tuning in relation to Scrum

Regarding fine-tuning Scrum, there are two interpretations that can be put into practice.

1. Fine-Tuning in Scrum Processes: In the context of Scrum, teams often engage in continuous improvement and adapt their processes to suit their specific needs. Fine-tuning in Scrum could refer to the practice of making small adjustments to the Scrum processes to enhance team performance, efficiency, or overall outcomes. These adjustments might involve optimizing the length of Sprint cycles, refining the Definition of Done, improving Daily Standup meetings, or enhancing the Sprint Review and Retrospective processes. Essentially, it involves tweaking the Scrum framework to better align with the team’s unique circumstances.

2. Fine-Tuning Scrum Team Dynamics: Alternatively, “fine-tuning scrum” could relate to improving the dynamics and collaboration within a Scrum team. This might involve refining communication patterns, optimizing the roles and responsibilities of team members, nurturing a culture of continuous learning and improvement, and addressing any challenges or conflicts that arise during the Scrum process.

Regardless of the specific interpretation, it is essential to remember that Scrum is an empirical process framework, and teams are encouraged to inspect and adapt regularly. Fine-tuning or making small adjustments is a natural part of the Scrum methodology to ensure teams are continuously learning and striving for excellence. However, any modifications should align with the Scrum principles and values and be agreed upon by the entire team and relevant stakeholders.

---

Case Study

Company: E-commerce Company W.

Company Background: Company W is an e-commerce company that sells a wide range of products online. As their business grew, they faced challenges in managing their software development projects effectively. To improve their development process and meet customer demands more efficiently, they decided to adopt the Scrum framework.

Initial Scrum Implementation: Company W hired Agile coaches and Scrum Masters to guide their Scrum implementation. They conducted comprehensive training sessions for their development teams and stakeholders. The teams were organized into Scrum teams, and the roles and responsibilities were clearly defined.

Challenges Identified: After a few Sprints, the company conducted a Sprint Review and Retrospective, during which they identified several challenges:

1. Inconsistent Sprint Outcomes: The teams’ Sprint outcomes varied significantly, with some Sprints delivering more than planned, while others fell short of the commitments.

2. Dependency Management: Some Scrum teams faced difficulties in managing dependencies between their work and work from other teams, leading to delays and coordination issues.

3. Lack of Empowerment: The Product Owner made most of the decisions without actively involving the development team, leading to a lack of ownership and motivation.

4. Limited Customer Involvement: The teams struggled to obtain timely and meaningful feedback from end-users and stakeholders, leading to potential misalignments in product development.

Fine-Tuning Scrum: Company W recognized the importance of continuous improvement and decided to fine-tune their Scrum practices:

1. Consistent Sprint Planning: The teams invested more time in Sprint Planning, breaking down user stories into smaller, more manageable tasks, and ensuring a shared understanding of the work to be done.

2. Cross-Team Coordination: The Scrum Masters facilitated regular cross-team coordination meetings to identify and address dependencies. They also established a dependency management board to visualize and track dependencies across team