(CLP) Programs

Appleton Greene corporate training programs are all process-driven. They are used as vehicles to implement tangible business processes within clients’ organizations, together with training, support and facilitation during the use of these processes. Corporate training programs are therefore implemented over a sustainable period of time, that is to say, between 1 year (incorporating 12 monthly workshops), and 4 years (incorporating 48 monthly workshops). Your program information guide will specify how long each program takes to complete. Each monthly workshop takes 6 hours to implement and can be undertaken either on the client’s premises, an Appleton Greene serviced office, or online via the internet. This enables clients to implement each part of their business process, before moving onto the next stage of the program and enables employees to plan their study time around their current work commitments. The result is far greater program benefit, over a more sustainable period of time and a significantly improved return on investment.

Appleton Greene uses standard and bespoke corporate training programs as vessels to transfer business process improvement knowledge into the heart of our clients’ organizations. Each individual program focuses upon the implementation of a specific business process, which enables clients to easily quantify their return on investment. There are hundreds of established Appleton Greene corporate training products now available to clients within customer services, e-business, finance, globalization, human resources, information technology, legal, management, marketing and production. It does not matter whether a client’s employees are located within one office, or an unlimited number of international offices, we can still bring them together to learn and implement specific business processes collectively. Our approach to global localization enables us to provide clients with a truly international service with that all important personal touch. Appleton Greene corporate training programs can be provided virtually or locally and they are all unique in that they individually focus upon a specific business function. All (CLP) programs are implemented over a sustainable period of time, usually between 1-4 years, incorporating 12-48 monthly workshops and professional support is consistently provided during this time by qualified learning providers and where appropriate, by Accredited Consultants.

---

Executive summary

Market Entry

In the ever-evolving landscape of international business, successful market entry stands as a pivotal strategy that can propel organisations towards unparalleled growth and global influence. Market entry, in essence, refers to the process of expanding a business’s operations from its domestic base into foreign territories. It involves navigating a complex web of cultural, economic, legal, and competitive factors, making it a multifaceted endeavour that demands precision, expertise, and strategic acumen.

Importance of Market Entry:

Market entry holds paramount significance as it opens avenues for organisations to tap into new customer bases, exploit untapped market potential, and diversify revenue streams. In a globalised world, where borders are increasingly permeable, businesses must capitalise on opportunities beyond their home markets to remain competitive. Market entry empowers organisations to reduce reliance on a single market and to hedge against economic downturns in a particular region. Furthermore, it allows them to harness unique strengths, such as technological expertise or specialised products, to gain a competitive edge in foreign markets.

---

Let’s explore the case study of Starbucks, a well-known coffeehouse chain, and its successful entry into the Chinese market.

Company Background:

Starbucks, an American coffee company and multinational chain, had established a strong presence in North America, Europe, and other parts of the world. In the early 2000s, Starbucks set its sights on China, recognising the vast market potential due to the country’s growing middle class and increasing coffee consumption.

Challenges:

Cultural Differences: China had a rich tea-drinking culture, and coffee consumption was not as deeply ingrained. Starbucks needed to adapt its offerings to cater to local tastes and preferences.

Competition: The Chinese market already had established local tea and coffee brands. Breaking into this competitive landscape required a unique and compelling strategy.

Store Design and Experience: The Western coffee shop culture, as epitomised by Starbucks, needed adjustments to align with Chinese preferences for a more social and relaxed atmosphere.

Market Entry Strategy:

Local Partnerships: To navigate China’s complex regulatory environment and gain insights into local consumer behaviour, Starbucks formed strategic partnerships. In 2017, Starbucks formed a partnership with Tencent and Alibaba for social gifting and delivery services.

Adapted Menu: Starbucks introduced items tailored to Chinese tastes, including teas, traditional pastries, and food items. They recognized the importance of respecting local preferences while maintaining their global brand identity.

Store Design and Localisation: Starbucks redesigned its stores to create a more inviting and social atmosphere, incorporating Chinese design elements. They aimed to position Starbucks outlets as third spaces for people to gather and socialise.

Digital Innovation: Recognising China’s advanced digital landscape, Starbucks incorporated digital innovations, including mobile payment options and a robust rewards program through their mobile app.

Implementation:

Gradual Expansion: Starbucks adopted a phased approach to expansion in China, focusing initially on key cities like Beijing and Shanghai before spreading to other regions. This allowed them to refine their strategy based on localised feedback.

Customer Engagement: Starbucks engaged with Chinese consumers through various marketing initiatives, emphasizing the quality of its coffee, the uniqueness of the Starbucks experience, and its commitment to corporate social responsibility.

Results:

Market Leadership: Starbucks successfully became a market leader in the Chinese coffeehouse sector. As of the latest available data, Starbucks has thousands of stores across China.

Brand Loyalty: The digital innovations, especially the mobile app, contributed to the development of a loyal customer base. The convenience of mobile payments and the rewards program appealed to Chinese consumers.

Cultural Integration: By respecting and integrating local culture into its offerings and store ambiance, Starbucks created a more inclusive brand image, breaking cultural barriers and making coffee a part of everyday life for many Chinese consumers.

Continuous Innovation: Starbucks continues to innovate in response to the dynamic Chinese market. They introduced new products, expanded their delivery services, and embraced sustainability initiatives.

In summary, Starbucks’ successful entry into the Chinese market highlights the importance of understanding and respecting local culture, strategic partnerships, gradual expansion, and continuous innovation in achieving international market success.

---

Requisite Skills and Knowledge:

Executing successful market entry demands a robust toolkit of skills and knowledge. This includes an acute understanding of global markets, proficiency in market research and analysis, cultural intelligence, negotiation skills, strategic planning, and the ability to navigate intricate legal and regulatory frameworks. The global business landscape is dynamic and varies vastly across regions, requiring market entrants to have a finger on the pulse of local trends, consumer behaviours, and emerging technologies. In the absence of these competencies, organisations risk stumbling into pitfalls that can hinder their market entry efforts and lead to financial losses, damaged reputation, or even legal complications.

---

Take the example of Target Corporation’s entry into Canada, which serves as an example of a company facing significant challenges and ultimately withdrawing from an international market.

Company Background:

Target Corporation, a prominent American retail chain, decided to expand internationally and entered the Canadian market in 2013. With its success in the United States, Target aimed to replicate its business model and capture a share of the Canadian retail market.

Challenges:

Supply Chain Issues: Target faced challenges in establishing an efficient and reliable supply chain in Canada. Issues such as distribution problems and supply chain disruptions led to empty shelves and frustrated customers.

Pricing Strategy: The company struggled with its pricing strategy. Canadian consumers were accustomed to different pricing structures, and Target’s initial approach to mirror U.S. pricing did not resonate well with the local market.

Lack of Understanding of Canadian Consumer Behaviour: Target did not thoroughly understand the preferences and shopping habits of Canadian consumers. The company’s product selection and marketing efforts did not align with the Canadian market’s expectations.

Market Entry Strategy:

Rapid Expansion: Target initially opened a significant number of stores across Canada in a short time frame. This rapid expansion placed immense pressure on the supply chain and operational capabilities.

Assumption of Similarities: Target assumed that its success in the United States could be replicated in Canada without adequately considering the differences in consumer behaviour, preferences, and regulatory environments.

Implementation:

Operational Challenges: The supply chain and distribution problems led to persistent issues with keeping products in stock. This resulted in a poor shopping experience for customers and impacted Target’s reputation.

Pricing Adjustments: Target had to adjust its pricing strategy after facing criticism for higher prices compared to its U.S. stores. However, these adjustments came too late to change consumer perceptions.

Results:

Financial Losses: Target faced significant financial losses in Canada. The company reported billions of dollars in losses, primarily attributed to the challenges in supply chain management and operational issues.

Brand Damage: The difficulties in meeting customer expectations and the operational challenges damaged Target’s brand reputation in Canada. The company struggled to recover from the negative image created during its entry.

Market Exit: In 2015, just two years after its entry, Target announced the closure of all its stores in Canada. This de