The Appleton Greene Corporate Training Program (CTP) for Business Optimization is provided by Mr. Erickson MBHRM BSEE Certified Learning Provider (CLP). Program Specifications: Monthly cost USD$2,500.00; Monthly Workshops 6 hours; Monthly Support 4 hours; Program Duration 24 months; Program orders will be subject to ongoing availability. Please scroll down for further information.
Client Program Order (CPO) Form – Business Optimization
Mr. Erickson is a Certified Learning Provider (CLP) at Appleton Greene and has experience in management, human resources and production. He has achieved a Master in Business Human Resource Management and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering. He has industry experience within the following sectors: Construction; Consultancy; Consumer Goods; Food & Beverage and Manufacturing. He has had commercial experience within the following countries: United States of America, Canada, Denmark, and Japan, or more specifically within the following cities: Minneapolis MN; Denver CO; Edmonton AB; Nakskov and Tokyo. His personal achievements include: growing $12M business to $40M; implementing financial management control processes; training founder to be CEO; reorganizing operating departments that improved throughput and established performance improvement processes. His service skills incorporate: business strategy; organizational development; business systems; leadership development and financial management.
To request further information about Mr. Erickson through Appleton Greene, please Click Here.
Appleton Greene corporate training programs are all process-driven. They are used as vehicles to implement tangible business processes within clients’ organizations, together with training, support and facilitation during the use of these processes. Corporate training programs are therefore implemented over a sustainable period of time, that is to say, between 1 year (incorporating 12 monthly workshops), and 4 years (incorporating 48 monthly workshops). Your program information guide will specify how long each program takes to complete. Each monthly workshop takes 6 hours to implement and can be undertaken either on the client’s premises, an Appleton Greene serviced office, or online via the internet. This enables clients to implement each part of their business process, before moving onto the next stage of the program and enables employees to plan their study time around their current work commitments. The result is far greater program benefit, over a more sustainable period of time and a significantly improved return on investment.
Appleton Greene uses standard and bespoke corporate training programs as vessels to transfer business process improvement knowledge into the heart of our clients’ organizations. Each individual program focuses upon the implementation of a specific business process, which enables clients to easily quantify their return on investment. There are hundreds of established Appleton Greene corporate training products now available to clients within customer services, e-business, finance, globalization, human resources, information technology, legal, management, marketing and production. It does not matter whether a client’s employees are located within one office, or an unlimited number of international offices, we can still bring them together to learn and implement specific business processes collectively. Our approach to global localization enables us to provide clients with a truly international service with that all important personal touch. Appleton Greene corporate training programs can be provided virtually or locally and they are all unique in that they individually focus upon a specific business function. All (CLP) programs are implemented over a sustainable period of time, usually between 1-4 years, incorporating 12-48 monthly workshops and professional support is consistently provided during this time by qualified learning providers and where appropriate, by Accredited Consultants.
In 2009 Mr. Erickson, developed a business consulting process to help owners of small and medium sized businesses improve the performance and ease of operations of their companies. This process evolved into the Business Optimization Process (BOP).
His consulting services initially focused on helping these owners learn how to better operate their businesses by applying sound business principles to their sales, operations, distribution, and financial management areas. Mr. Erickson’s knowledge and experience came from years of working in various technical, managerial and executive positions in large and medium sized corporations. He felt the best way to effectively improve business performance was to integrate the concepts of Systems Theory and Thinking, the Theory of Constraints, and Transformational Leadership into a comprehensive management process.
Systems Theory and Thinking apply to the way any organization operates. Organizations are systems and thus are influenced by certain laws, characteristics and principles. Change becomes easier when these laws, characteristics and principles are understood as they apply to a given organization. The Theory of Constraints applies to any organization and, in a nutshell, says that the throughput or performance of any organization is limited by a single constraining point. Finding and correcting this constraining point immediately improves a company’s throughput capacity and thus its performance. Transformational Leadership is a style of leadership that effectively creates focus throughout an organization by having a clear vision of what needs to be accomplished. This vision is the driver behind the leadership efforts and is effective at motivating the people throughout the organization to accomplish the improvements needed.
As his client base grew Mr. Erickson began to expand his approach to the way his company provided consulting services. The approach evolved into a four phase business improvement model (“Model”) where all phases are interrelated and interconnected. These phases were specifically developed to help owners create the improvements needed in their business so they would have the freedom to do what they would want with their business. The Model guided business owners in effectively improving their business from how their business was currently operating to how it needed to operate in order to meet the owner’s goals.
The first phase of the Model was the Planning phase. This phase included a combination of Ownership Planning and Business Planning. The philosophy of the Model is that a business is basically one of several tools an owner chose to help them achieve their personal goals. Therefore, business planning was driven by the results of ownership planning. Ownership planning was the owner assessing what they want from life and how their business fits into their wants.
Planning led to the second phase, which was Optimization. During this phase the flow of work through the sales, operations, distribution, and financial areas of the company was first balanced and then systematically increased to improve the capacity, throughput and profitability of the company. This phase included improving operating processes and philosophies as well as applying cash management principles to the financial management practices so that targeted cash flow was realized from these profits.
The third phase was Building Value, which has to do with building sustainable and growing business value. This phase included developing managerial depth and processes, and implementing business communication tools that allowed those within the business to know what was expected of them and to give them feedback on the results of their efforts. The fourth phase of the Model included a process of ensuring that the owner had the proper financial base and documentation in place to ensure a smooth transition and successful exit.
As Mr. Erickson applied the principles of the Model to a growing number of businesses the need for teaching change management principles became more apparent. Most people, especially those in an ownership or executive management position understand the difficulty that change brings to any organization. The concept of resistance to change is all too apparent anytime an organization goes through change. Mr. Erickson used his corporate experiences in having led change efforts in large and medium sized companies and the knowledge gained through a formal post graduate business education to expand on the processes he used in the Model. The Model is the forerunner of the BOP.
Business Optimization – Current Position
The BOP is a corporate focused training program that effectively creates change throughout a company. One of the problems many companies have with their current training programs are they tend to focus on improving one area with the idea that if that area is improved the whole company should improve. Often company leadership believes the key problem lies in one area when in fact it may lie in a different area. When this happens, the effect from the training efforts are diminished and results in little to no real improvement in the overall performance of the company.
There are two prevalent reasons training efforts fail. These reasons are that the focus is on the wrong area and the training itself involves a limited number of employees. Owners who want to see improvement in the overall performance of their companies need to implement training processes that address the company as a whole and that are deigned to find and correct the right area. The BOP is designed to do just that.
As explained in the previous section the BOP has its roots in the Model. It is an improvement process that starts at the top of an organization and systematically focuses the entire organization on solving the one issue that is most limiting the performance of a company. In this way the whole organization is involved at different levels and each person involved learns the improvement process as it applies to their function within the company. It is a way to focus everyone’s efforts on solving the most critical problem. This approach puts everyone in the same boat and rowing in the same direction.
In the fast-pace world of competitive businesses it is becoming harder to find ways to effectively increase revenues and profits. It is becoming increasingly important that companies find ways to increase their performance while achieving a quick return on every training dollar they spend. It is also becoming increasingly important that companies create a working environment that is conducive to employee retention.
The BOP is designed to guide a company through the process of effectively implementing change. It is a process that involves employees from just about every job level beginning with the Owner and working its way through management, supervision and the rank and file employees.
The reason the BOP is effective is in the way it integrates the management concepts of Systems Theory and Thinking, the Theory of Constraints and Transformational Leadership. The BOP intertwines these established concepts into a process that focuses the resources of a company to achieving a single goal. This goal is finding and fixing the problem that is most limiting or constraining a company from improving its performance. Using this approach allows the focus to systematically funnel down to those who have the greatest impact on solving this problem.
The BOP by its nature able to help create significant changes in the way a company performs without creating a lot resistance to change companies often experience. Dealing with resistance to change can end up being expensive in the form of lost production and increased human resource and management issues, not to mention delays in achieving the benefits realized when the change is fully implemented.
Owners are also looking for ways to create significant improvements while minimizing disruption caused by people who are not cooperative or supportive of the change process or where working on the wrong problems or making the wrong decisions end up actually hurting the performance of a company rather than improving it.
The BOP is also a process that engages the employees in a way that reduces employee issues while creating skilled teams of employees that effectively and continually improve the company. This makes it easier to hire and retain employees, which reduces turnover. Reduced turnover has a direct impact on future training costs and a company’s ability to compete in today’s world of growing economies and opportunities. The BOP is a process that once learned can be repeated over and over again. It is an ongoing process that allows companies to rapidly identify and solve the current problem that is most constraining or limiting its ability to continually improve. The BOP gives companies an unsurpassed way to accelerate their performance, which can give them a competitive edge in today’s marketplace.
Business Optimization – Future Outlook
As competition increases it is going to become more important to increase the way organizations approach employee skill enhancement and organizational effectiveness. It is also going to be more difficult for business owners to find the time and resources to implement effective training that improves overall organizational effectiveness. On top of these two challenges many business owners do not know where to begin if they want to improve organizational effectiveness. These are what the BOP is designed to solve. This process is a comprehensive learning system that involves the whole company in a way that focuses the entire organization in improving business performance and giving it the ability to achieve more profits and top line revenue.
Loyalty of employees toward their employers and employers toward their employees seems to be waning. This is happening at the same time that competition for skilled employees is on the rise. Companies not only need skilled workers they also need organizational effectiveness to ensure that every worker is contributing to the goals and objectives of the company. Companies are facing growing competition while at the same time it is becoming more difficult for the consumer to differentiate between competing products and services. This means that a company’s organizational effectiveness will become increasingly important in determining its competitive advantage.
As we move into the future, corporate training will need to be increasingly focused on moving the whole organization toward achieving its goals. It will also become increasingly important to include and solicit participation from all employees from the top executives to line employees. One of the challenges will be to accomplish this type of training with minimal to no disruption of existing business requirements.
It will become increasingly important that future corporate training involves the whole organization beginning with articulated goals that are established at the top. The goals must be apparent to everyone throughout the organization and must drive the training focus. In order to have a positive effect on the whole organization, and thus improve overall performance, corporate training must be geared to the whole company, not just a few individuals.
The old saying, “the more things change, the more they stay the same”, will continue to be true. Regardless of the growth in technology, companies still need to operate using time-tested principals. These time-tested principals include the role of leadership in providing direction to an organization, the importance of teams in organizational effectiveness and the need for people to have the necessary skills while feeling they are important as individuals.
The BOP is ideal for those companies who need to improve their overall organizational effectiveness. Because the process systematically works its way down through a company it aligns everyone in contributing toward reaching corporate goals. It helps owners develop, quantify and articulate goals. It helps develop varying leadership skills with individual throughout the organization. It creates synergy among employees by developing effective team work at all levels. As a result it develops effective and efficient organizations, and it does this in a systematic way that creates little to no disruption, nor adds undue burden to any employee, from the top of the organization to the bottom.
As competitive pressure increases companies will continue to need to improve their marketing, human resource and technical skills. There are many types of training programs designed to help companies in these areas. However, it will become increasingly important for companies to also improve their overall organization effective and skills, beginning at the top and including everyone within the organization. The solution to improving this organizational effectiveness will be significantly helped by processes like the BOP.
The following list represents the Key Program Objectives (KPO) for the Appleton Greene Business Optimization corporate training program.
Business Optimization – Year 1
Part 1 Month 1 Getting Started The top executive or Owner and his or her senior staff are the participants of this and the next two modules. The objectives are for the participants to gain an overall understanding of the Business Optimization Process referred to as the BOP and to take the initial steps in the implementation of the BOP. The initial step is leaning that BOP is mission driven. It is a corporate focused, team building process that teaches the skills needed to effectively improve an organization’s performance. It accomplishes this by training employees to systematically identify and solve the root cause of the problem that is most constraining the performance of the organization. It is a continuous improvement process that once implemented results in a higher level of satisfied customers and a more enjoyable work environment for the employees. These results lead to a financially stronger organization that brings long-term stability and better rewards and job security for everyone. The BOP integrates the principles of Systems Theory and Thinking, the Theory of Constraints, and Transformational Leadership. The participants will develop the mission and vision statements for the BOP. The mission statement clarifies the purpose of the BOP and provides direction for the organization during the implementation of the BOP. The vision statement shows what the company looks like after the mission is accomplished and inspires and challenges people to accomplish the mission. Anytime there is a companywide focus it is imperative that the Owner be the driver behind the effort. This can be scary and daunting to an Owner who already has more work on his or her plate than they can get done and who sees an organization that is in the same boat. Having a corporate focus is extremely important if a company is to see ongoing, sustainable growth. It is also important that this effort be planned and implemented in a way that does not disrupt the critical components of the ongoing business. The participants will gain a basic understanding of Systems Theory and Thinking and how it applies to their organization. Organizations are systems and as such adhere to certain laws, characteristics and principles that when understood make organizational change efforts less stressful and disruptive and more successful in the end.
Part 1 Month 2 Second Step
The objectives are to have the participants set goals and strategies for the BOP and to learn the second principle of the BOP, the Theory of Constraints (ToC). The ToC is a systematic method using the laws, characteristics and principles of System Theory and Thinking to lead an organization through a problem solving process. This process helps employees effectively find the root cause of the problem that is most constraining the throughput of an organization. The mission for the BOP was determined during the first module. During this second module the participants determine the cash flow required to achieve the mission. In order to produce a given level of cash flow a company must achieve a certain level of throughput. Throughput is the amount of products or services a company can efficiently produce and deliver to a client in a specific period of time. Once the level of throughput is determined strategies to achieve this throughput need to be developed. Often goals are throttled back because of perceived throughput limitations that set artificially low ceilings that Owners accept. They accept these ceilings because they are unsure how to effectively raise them. The focus of ToC is on improving overall throughput of a company. ToC starts with the premise that the goal of every company is to make money. Historically, companies have more often than not concentrated on reducing costs to make more money. Though controlling costs is obviously important it is always a short term focus and often ineffective in creating long term improvement. Without increasing throughput, improvement is eventually limited by the amount of costs that can be reduced. The ToC aligns the whole organization to focus on company goals and improving key areas to achieve these goals. ToC is designed to not only improve the bottom line but to create a culture of cooperation and the creative energy needed to reverse entropy and overcome inertia which are inherent in any system. In almost all cases owners want is to maximize company profits in ways that benefit not only themselves but their employees, customers and vendors, and the local community to which they belong. Along with maximizing profits, most owners want to improve employee morale, reduce management stress, increase leadership throughout an organization, reduce overhead, and improve customer relations and retention. ToC accomplishes the above by harnessing every employee’s abilities in a synergistic way that accelerates a company’s performance. The results from implementing the BOP approach are not only improved business capacity and performance but improved worker loyalty, skill sets, productivity and satisfaction.
Part 1 Month 3 Leadership Team
The objectives of this module are for the participants to establish the Leadership Team and to learn the principle of Transformational Leadership. Not only is the application of Systems Theory and Thinking and the ToC essential to effectively improving company performance, so is leadership. Therefore, the third step in learning about the BOP is the need to develop transformational leadership skills in people throughout your company starting with the participants of this module. Transformational leadership is where the leader first creates a vision that is used to drive the organization forward. In order for the vision to drive the organization the leader must share it with his or her followers and the followers must understand and buy into it. The leader then helps his or her followers identify what needs to change in order to achieve the vision. This leadership style uses the vision as the starting point to inspire followers. This vision creates the energy and commitment among the followers to implement the required change. The BOP trains various employees throughout a company on leadership principles and skills. These individuals apply these principles and skills as they lead the various teams that are formed to implement the required changes. During the first module the Owner and his or her senior staff developed the mission for the BOP and the vision of what it looks like when the mission is accomplished. The participants learned Systems Theory and Thinking and how its laws, characteristics and principles apply to their company. During the second module the same participants determined the cash flow and throughput levels required to achieve the mission and set strategies to accomplish these levels. The participants learned the concepts of the ToC and how Systems Theory and Thinking is integrated with the tools of the ToC to create the change necessary to accomplish the mission. During this third module the Owner and his or her senior staff will integrate what they learned about Systems Theory and Thinking and ToC with the principles of Transformational Leadership in order to have a foundational understanding of the BOP. At the end of the module the Owner will select participants for the Leadership Team of which he or she is the team leader.
Part 1 Month 4 Team Goals
The objectives of this module are for the members of the Leadership Team to define the team’s role and goals. The roles will be defined so as to not be overly burdensome on the members of the Leadership Team or on the organization as a whole. The result will be an understanding of the Leadership Team’s purpose or charter, the BOP, team goals and responsibilities, and how team members work with each other. This includes establishing communication protocols by determining the frequency and structure of meetings, participants in these meetings, format for the communicating progress, etc. Another important aspect is determining the level of commitment from the members of the Leadership Team. The members of the team will jointly decide the goals for the team, which will align with the mission, goals and strategies established in the previous three modules. There needs to be open dialog between team members. Team members must be able to give input in establishing team goals, ask questions as to the reason behind a given goal and thoroughly discuss any goals or issues that are not clear. The goals must be “SMART” (Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Relevant and Trackable) and each member must agree that each goal meets these criteria. The members of the Leadership Team must get to the point where everyone agrees and commits to these criteria. If someone cannot do this the goal in question is further discussed until a resolution is determined. If a member simply cannot agree and is at odds with the rest of the team that person should be removed from the team and replaced if needed. After the goals are finalized the expected results will be quantified so that each goal has a measureable outcome. Each goal is then documented in such a way as it can be shared with appropriate personnel within the organization. In order for a business to be “firing on all eight cylinders” the flow of work through the organization must be in balance and capable of meeting the company’s objectives. Accomplishing this requires a company wide effort all focused on the same objectives. The Owner’s job is to ensure that this happens. The team provides management oversight and takes the responsibility for ensuring that the mission drives the BOP.
Part 1 Month 5 Team KPIs
The objective of this module is for the Leadership Team to learn about Key Success Drivers or KSDs and Key Performance Indicators or KPIs. KSDs are those few activities that are critical for achieving the results desired. If these activities do not happen you will not accomplish the mission. A KPI is a metric that measures the results of these key success drivers in a way that quickly communicates how a company is performing against meeting its mission objectives. Even though there are multiple activities associated with operating any company only a few of them are critical. The rest may be useful but if not performed properly will not affect achieving the mission. The Leadership Team learns how to determine, measure, and use KPIs. Properly defined KPIs help align the whole organization. This means that each area within the organization is focused on those activities whose results are reflected in the KPIs. Since these KPIs represent how a company is performing, the information gathered from each department should tie into these KPIs. A properly defined KPI provides the type of information that can act as an early warning indicator if something within the organization is drifting away from producing the value desired. It helps keep people throughout the organization focused and accountable for accomplishing their part in supporting the company. Each area and person in a company is thereby focused on those tasks that help the company accomplish its mission. Once the KPIs are established, company performance against each KSD is documented, establishing a baseline against which future performance is measured. This allows top management to see the ongoing improvements made and the impact of these improvements on the whole organization. These measurements also give an early indication if some of the activities need to be adjusted in order to keep progress on track.
Part 1 Month 6 Company Workflow
The objective of this module is for the Leadership Team to learn to map the flow of work as it passes through the company at the departmental level. Once they know how to map the flow of work they will learn to use this map to identify which department contains the most critical bottleneck that currently limits the company’s ability to effectively increase its business volume. The overriding reason behind the BOP is to ensure that the right problems are worked on and resolved. All too often companies spend their time fixing problems that end up not impacting the goals of the organization. To effectively begin to identify which problems need to be fixed the Leadership Team must first understand the way business flows through the company on a department by department, or function by function basis. Defining the Company Workflow involves creating a visible flowchart that identifies the major areas or functions within the company through which the company’s products or services flow. These major areas or functions are basically defined as the areas involved in finding the work (Sales), producing the work (Operations), distributing and delivering the work (Distribution), and funding the work (Finance). They can also include areas such as Product Development, Estimating, Logistics, etc. depending on the size of the areas and where they are within the company organization. The requirements in each area must be driven by the mission for the BOP. This module is called Company Workflow because it looks at the major areas or departments of a company and depicts how they relate to each other as work flows through the company. The responsibility for creating this map falls to the Leadership Team because its members are more able to see the big picture without being drawn down into departmental minutia. In other words, they are more able to see the forest and not all the individual trees. The trees will become apparent as the process works its way down through the organization. The Leadership Team will learn how to establish and draw this workflow map by looking at how value is added within and between each of the major areas or departments of the business. The members will then learn to identify the amount of work or business capacity of each department. The department with the lowest business capacity is considered the “constraining” department.
Part 1 Month 7 Management Team
The objectives of this module are for the Leadership Team to learn the process of forming a management team and to make sure that the members of the Management Team understand their roles, expectations, responsibilities and goals. The purpose of the Management Team is to carry out the directives of the Leadership Team. It is the second management layer in the organization and is comprised of key managers who are one level below the members of the Leadership Team. The Management Team is responsible for understanding the business process and how each department contributes to helping the company achieve its mission. They are responsible for directing a focused effort needed to determine the key areas within the constraining department that is preventing the company from achieving its goals. This team will be responsible for directing future problem identification and solving efforts. The Process will guide the Leadership Team as it forms this Management Team. The Leadership and Management Teams will learn how to determine the role of and goals for the Management Team. The result will be an understanding of the Management Team’s purpose or charter, the BOP, team goals and responsibilities, and how team members will work with each other. This will include establishing communication protocols between the Leadership and Management Teams. This will include determining the frequency and structure of meetings, participants in these meetings, format for communicating progress, etc. Another important aspect is determining the level of commitment from members of the Management Team. The Management Team will learn how the Leadership Team identified the business capacity of the constraining department and together the two teams will establish what the capacity should be if the company is to reach its goals. The Management Team will learn how to assess the impact of increasing the capacity of the constraining department. They will learn how to determine their options based on their assessments. The members of the team will better understand how the constraining department functions and what things impact the performance of the department.
Part 1 Month 8 Department KPIs
The objective of this module is for the Management Team to learn how to determine and apply KPIs for each department in order to align each department with company goals. For the same reason that the company determined its KPIs, each department must have its own set of KPIs that feed into the company’s. The same basic process used to establish the company KPIs is used here. The Management Team takes the lead, with input from the Leadership Team, and is responsible for establishing each department’s KPIs. One of the problems many companies face is that individual departments have their own set of performance measurements that do not necessarily align with the overall direction of the company. As an example, the corporate focus may be on achieving targeted gross profits or margins on its sales, where the sales department is focused on hitting certain sales numbers regardless of the gross profit generated by the revenue. As with company KPIs, departmental KPIs are no more than a dozen indicators that communicate to the department manager how his or her department is doing in contributing to the company’s strategic goals and direction. The Management Team with assistance from each department manager determines and documents the current performance or baseline of each department against the departments KPIs. This is necessary so improvements can be measured. Another reason for measuring the performance of a given department against its KPIs is to provide more of a business mindset among the department managers. Often, department managers are disconnected from the overall business goals of the Owner. Department managers can have a myopic view of the business because their focus is on their department’s performance and hitting the goals established for their department. They tend to have little understanding of what is and is not important to the overall business since their focus is only on their department. Looking at the performance of a department with KPIs that are aligned with company KPIs is often a change in thinking for a department manager. A manager who prides him or herself for performing well against previous expectations may resist or feel threatened when expectations change. Change must be managed so people do not perceive they are being punished when the rules shift. A lot of communication and discussions with each department manager must take place. These managers must be involved in helping determine the changes required within their department.
Part 1 Month 9 Throughput Analysis
There are three objectives for this module. The first is to for the members of the Management Team to learn how to use a workflow map to more fully understand the flow of business and be able to apply this knowledge to develop a future, more detailed workflow map. The second is for them to understand the maximum effective business capacity each department can handle in line with company goals. The third is for them to begin learning to work amongst themselves as they dialog and define the business capacity in each department without becoming defensive or antagonistic. Instead, they will begin to learn how to work together as a synergistic team with the focus on achieving the overall goals and objectives of the company. During this step in the process the Management Team takes the Company Workflow map that the Leadership Team completed in Part 1 Month 6 and verifies their assumptions by determining the amount of business each department can handle. This is based on the maximum business, in revenue dollars that each department can effectively handle without making any capital investment. Direct costs are not considered capital investment. In other words, if a department would only need to hire direct labor or purchase more materials in order to produce more products or services, then it is not restricted in its capacity at this point. However, if adding more direct labor or materials would not allow a department to increase its throughput then the department is at capacity and this capacity becomes limiting. The result of this module will be a more thorough understanding by members of the Management Team for how work flows through the company and the general location of the most significant constraint that is limiting the business capacity of the company.
Part 1 Month 10 Project Team
The objectives of this module are for the Management Team to apply the process of creating a Project Team and to make sure that the members of the Project Team understand their roles, expectations, responsibilities and goals. This team is the third layer in the BOP and is comprised of the employees who have the most intimate knowledge of the way the constraining department operates. The purpose of the Project Team is to verify the constraining point in the constraining department and then develop and implement solutions that will improve the throughput at this particular point. The Management Team will be guided as it forms this Project Team and will apply what it learned when their team was formed. The Management and Project Team will determine the role and goals of the Project Team. The result will be an understanding of the Project Team’s purpose or charter, the BOP, team goals and responsibilities, and how team members will work with each other. This will include establishing communication protocols between the Management and the Project Teams. It will include determining the frequency and structure of meetings, participants in these meetings, format for the communicating progress, etc. Another important aspect is to determine the level of commitment from members of the Project Team. The Project Team will learn how the Management Team identified the constraint within the constraining department and together the two teams learn how they will establish potential solutions to increase the throughput at the constraining point. They will also learn how to assess the impact of increasing the capacity of the constraining department. They will learn how to determine their options based on their assessments. Going through this module will help members of the team better understand how this department functions and what things impact the performance of the department. The outcome of this module is for the Project Team to identify the most prominent bottleneck within the constraining department. Once this is accomplished it is time to burrow down into the bottleneck.
Part 1 Month 11 Team Development
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to function as an effective synergistic team. This will be accomplished with basic team development training techniques and will include involvement of the Management Team. Now that the ground work is set and before the Project Team starts focusing on how to increase the throughput of the department it is important that members of the team first know and buy in to the team’s charter. This is critical and the first step if the members of the team are to all pull in the same direction. There must be buy-in and public commitment to this charter by each team member. Any member that does not buy in to the charter must be replaced by someone who does. Once all members understand and have committed to the charter, team rules need to be clarified. These rules will establish the process by which problems are identified, decisions are made, disagreements are resolved, changes are implemented, and performance against benchmarks are tracked and communicated. In short, the objective of this module is to ensure that the Project Team becomes an effective, synergistic team that accomplishes the goals set by the Management Team. This training will also include a deeper look at the communication protocols established in the previous module. Well defined and developed communication protocol and rules reinforce the teams focus and ensures that each member of the team is fully engaged and supporting the direction established earlier. Participants will learn what constitutes effective communications. Having good protocols and rules makes it almost as easy to address negative issues as it is to address positive ones. Difficult problems that could cause the team to be in jeopardy of missing a benchmark can be addressed head-on in a way that pulls the team together in a problem solving attitude as opposed to ignoring these types of issues. Significant issues that contribute to why teams fail often boil down to how disagreements are handled, the clarity of roles and duties, and the way dissenting members communicate and discuss the reason behind their dissent. People withhold critical information because either they do not understand the criticalness of the information, do not feel it is their responsibility to communicate, afraid of “stepping on toes” or simply afraid of the potential repercussions (i.e. “shooting the messenger”). It is important that the members have a thorough understanding of what is expected of them. These individuals will be the closest to the problem and will have the greatest impact on solving the problem. Therefore, it is important that they learn about team dynamics and how to create a supportive and synergistic team environment.
Part 1 Month 12 Departmental Workflow
The objective of this module is for the Project Team with input from the Management Team to learn how to develop a visible detailed workflow map of the constraining department. The map will depict all operations within the department and how they are interconnected. Now that the Project Team has been established it is time to burrow down into this department to determine the most prevalent bottleneck that limits the amount of work that can flow through this department. Similar steps that were taken to produce the Company Workflow map are now used to develop a more detailed workflow that looks at each operational step with the constraining department. This is a critical step in understanding more fully how business flows through this department. The responsibility for creating this workflow map belongs to the Project Team. They are closer and more able to see the right level of detail that would be missed by the Management Team. The Project Team learns how to establish and draw a more detailed workflow map by looking at how the key processes within this department are connected. This begins by looking at the point work leaves the department and working backwards through the department to the point that it receives the work from the previous department. As an example, the department produces a widget and sends it to the finished goods warehouse. Prior to this step the widget has to be assembled which cannot happen until the raw material warehouse delivers the components necessary to produce the widget, which is the preceding department in this workflow. A widget can be a step in producing a material product or a step in providing a service. Regardless, each step within a company should add increasing value to the finished product or service while not hindering the company’s output capacity.
Business Optimization – Year 2
Part 2 Month 1 Department Metrics
The objective of this module is for the Management and Project Teams to learn how to determine and establish the types of metrics that will be used to track progress toward reaching the goal of the BOP within the department. Proper metrics and visibility of these metrics not only help keep the departmental organization focused, but also provide the ability to quickly identify when the results begin to deviate from a goal. This gives the people the opportunity to make timely corrective action to ensure that the program stays on track. There are three levels of metrics. The first is measuring the activities of team participants to make sure that everyone is doing what they are assigned to do. The second is measuring the outcome of these activities. The third is ensuring that these activities produce results that align with company goals and that are reflected in company and department KPIs. The team will learn and apply rules that are used to develop effective metrics. They will learn and apply hierarchical metrics that involve the above three areas and that communicate progress to department and to upper management. Once metrics are established it is important to document how the various operations within the department are performing against each metric. Improvements can then be quantified as the department moves through the BOP. This is necessary so that improvements from current performance levels can be documented. Each metric is to be validated to determine if it reflects the KPIs of the department. It is up to the Project Team to ensure that departmental metrics feed into the company KPIs. Aligning operational steps with key metrics often creates significant changes within a department. This change, if not implemented correctly can cause stress and negative energy within a group of people. It is important that these changes be conducted in a positive and non-threatening manner. A group of employees that prides itself on performing well against previous expectations may resist or feel threatened when expectations change. Again, as with the department managers, change must be managed and people must not perceive that they are being punished when the rules shift. A lot of communication and discussions with the employees must take place and they must be involved in determining how they can move their operation from where it is to where it needs to be based on the new or modified metrics.
Part 2 Month 2 Problem Solving
The main objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn team problem solving techniques. The Management Team is involved at some level so they gain an understanding of the approach the Project Team will be taking. A secondary, yet vitally important objective is to use the process of teaching problem solving to reinforce what the Project Team learned in Part 1 Month 11 on team dynamics and to reinforce the rules under which the Project Team will operate. Fundamental to solving any problem is to identify where the problem first becomes apparent and then systematically work through the effects of the problem until the root cause is discovered. Until the root cause is discovered all efforts to solve the problem will simply cover up symptoms and the effects of the problem will never go away. To effectively solve any problem the root cause must be identified and eliminated. This is accomplished by making a list of potential causes then systematically going through each potential cause to evaluate its impact. The cause that seems to have the biggest negative impact will become the focus of the change. The next step is to make a list of potential solutions and then systematically evaluate each potential solution to determine if it will correct the root cause. The third step is to evaluate how to apply this change in a way that does not disrupt critical functions during the change process. The fourth step is to evaluate the potential results to determine if there will be any undesirable effects from the change. This thinking process is circular until the team is convinced that the selected change will eliminate the root cause without creating more problems than it solves.
Part 2 Month 3 Communicating Goals
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to articulate its goals and associated metrics in a positive and understandable way and communicate this information to the people impacted by the changes. It is also intended to explain the BOP process, the role of the Project Team and how various employees could be involved. The Project Team will outline the BOP and their team charter structured in a way that speaks to the employees within the department. The Project Team will list their goals and priorities, the reason these goals and priorities have been selected, and how performance will be measured. The team will use this information to develop an effective presentation and then present it to those people most closely associated with the constraining operation. Not only will the Project Team present the goals and metrics, they will also explain how progress toward meeting these goals will be measured and displayed. During the presentation employees will be given the opportunity to ask questions and give constructive suggestions. The purpose is to reinforce the reason for using the BOP, ensure that employees understand what will be taking place and to get support from these employees. It is a broadening of the team building process that took place earlier. The information presented is focused on the employees in the constraining department and the reason why this department was selected. The meeting is informal allowing two way dialog that gives the employees the ability to ask questions or voice concerns. Some of the members of the Management Team will be present to reinforce the charter of the Project Team to the employees and to show management support and involvement. It will provide the opportunity for employees to ask questions that may not be able to be answered by the Project Team. The result will be a group of employees that understand how their lives will be impacted and how the outcome will benefit them along with the company as a whole.
Part 2 Month 4 Identifying Constraints
The objective for this module is for the Project Team to learn how to use the Department Workflow map developed earlier to identify the major constraint within the department. The Project Team takes the Department Workflow map and determines the amount of volume each operation within the department can handle. This is based on the maximum business in revenue dollars that each operation depicted in the Department Workflow map could effectively handle with no additional capital investment. Direct costs are not considered capital investment. In other words, if an operation would only need to hire direct labor or purchase more materials in order to produce more products or services, then it is not restricted in its capacity at this point. However, if adding more direct labor or materials would not allow an operation to increase its throughput then the department is operating at capacity. The process that the Project Team will use will give it the ability to identify where this point is. The outcome of this module is for the Project Team to define the operation that has the lowest business capacity as identified by team member consensus. This process will help the team better work together to define the business capacity in each operation without becoming defensive or antagonistic. They will become a more synergistic team focused on their contribution toward achieving department goals and objectives. Now that the lowest capacity operations is identified and agreed upon by the members of the Project Team the next step is to burrow down into this operation to determine what is causing the constraint within the operation.
Part 2 Month 5 Process Mapping
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to develop a visible process map of the constraining operation as defined in the previous module. The first step is for the Project Team to understand the way work flows through the constraining operation within this department. The same process that was used earlier by the Project Team to create the Department Workflow will be used to map out all the processes involved in moving work through the constraining operation. The function of this team is to closely look at and dissect every step associated with this operation. The Project Team will create a process map of the constraining operation. A process map is essentially a workflow map with more detail. It is an expanded mapping process of a single operation. The Process Map includes every step within the operation. The difference from earlier workflow maps is that the Process Map looks at all inputs from material flow, labor, scheduling, employee work rules, management practices, etc. The purpose of the Process Map is to visibly show all the steps in the operation and to identify which steps are dependent on other steps, whether influenced by things within the department or outside of the department. Some of the employees who directly work in this operation will be asked to participate in the mapping process. The Project Team learns how to develop a process map by looking at how all the required steps are connected. This is accomplished by again beginning at the end, which is where the work leaves this operation and working backwards through each preceding step. This process is repeated until every step involved in the operation is identified, including policies, practices, operating procedures, as well at individual positions, equipment, processes and location of work stations.
Part 2 Month 6 Process Metrics
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to determine and track those metrics that will quickly quantify the improvements of the constraining operation. These metrics will complement the metrics used by the department and the company. Team members will learn and apply rules that are used to develop effective metrics, metrics that are targeted to the particular operation. Proper metrics and visibility of these metrics not only help keep the Project Team focused, they also provide the ability to quickly identify when the results begin to deviate from a goal. This gives the team members the opportunity to make timely corrective action to ensure that the program stays on track. After the metrics have been determined for the particular operation it is important to document how the various steps within the operation are currently performing against each metric. This is important so that results from improvements can be quantified. Often new metrics are introduced and some of the older metrics are modified as people look at the mission of the BOP and gain a growing understanding of the BOP. It is important for the employees to understand these metrics and the reasons behind them. Employees need to know that every process within the company must be measured against how it is contributing to helping the company reach its goals. This will require educating those employees who are directly involved in the particular operation not only on process metrics but also on department KPIs and why these KPIs are important. The employees need to understand the role they play in contributing to the overall success of the company. This builds ownership thinking and makes the employees feel important and part of a bigger team.
Part 2 Month 7 Process Improvement
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to apply a combination of problem solving and brainstorming techniques learned in Part 2 Month 2. They will be guided through the process of effectively determining the top three reasons why a certain place in a process is limiting the flow of work. The objective is accomplished by the Project Team focusing on the area they identified while mapping the process. They will use the Process Map to develop a comprehensive list of every input that directly or indirectly affects the operation at the constraining point including policies, practices, procedures, work rules, operating steps, etc. From here the Project Team will be guided through an objective system that allows the team to prioritize the inputs that have the greatest impact on the way this process functions. They will learn to apply team focused problem solving techniques. Once the inputs are prioritized, the team will learn how to analyze the prioritized inputs to make sure that the list of inputs is complete and that each input does in fact affect the throughput at the constraining point. The expected results will be two or three potential solutions that will focus the team on where to put their resources in order to improve the flow at the constraining point while at the same time minimizing any disruption. In conjunction with applying problem solving techniques the members will be introduced to the concept of potential problem analysis. They will need to know potential repercussions from applying each of the top two or three solutions before any change is made. They will be trained in how to accomplish this in the next Module.
Part 2 Month 8 Impact Analysis
The objective of this module is for the Project Teams to learn how to determine potential positive and negative impacts and repercussions from each of the top two or three solutions. It is important to know how each solution will impact the cost, schedule, product quality, employees, department throughput, etc. during and after the time the solution is implemented. The Project Team will learn how to effectively proceed through the process of potential problem analysis using reverse brainstorming and bullet proofing techniques. The team will be guided through a process of identifying anything that could create problems while implementing one or more of the top two or three solutions. It is important that the team have this understanding before work begins on making any improvement. The Project Team will be guided through a simple cost-benefit analysis process to identify and list all the costs and benefits of each solution. Once the potential problems and the cost-benefits are established the team is ready to decide which solution will give the “biggest bang for the buck”. The Project Team will by consensus understand which solution should be implemented. They will understand the pros and cons to each solution and what needs to happen in order to minimize the risk of problems developing while implementing the solution. Part of this step will be developing contingency plans to work around a potential problem if they run into one. The team will then be ready to develop an action plan and make the improvements necessary to increase the throughput at the constraining operation.
Part 2 Month 9 Improvement Implementation
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to take the results of the previous module and develop an implementation plan. They will use the plan and apply the changes required in a way that does not disrupt critical business operations or product and service delivery. This involves the members of the Project Team working constructively together with other employees to determine how the solutions will be implemented. They will layout the sequence of activities and identify which employees are going to do what. They will understand how their actions will affect other parts of the company, what other parts of the company need to be involved, and how to coordinate their efforts. The Project Team will be guided through the process of determining how the solutions should be implemented. Based on the list of potential problems from the previous module, they will determine contingency plans to work around or solve any problems that negatively affect the ongoing business. They will be able to constructively respond to issues that may come up and modify their approach as may be needed. They will make sure all affected employees know what is happening. It is important when changes are made that the critical factors such as quality, delivery schedules and customer service levels. not be compromised. Therefore, part of determining a course of action will involve a company perspective of how the targeted point in the process impacts the overall output of the company. Once the critical factors are understood and contingency plans are in place, the team will begin to implement changes. They will be prepared to use one or more of the contingencies or work-arounds if implementation problems appear.
Part 2 Month 10 Measuring Results
The objective of this module is for the Project Team to learn how to establish simple and precise methods to measure improvements using the metrics and reporting formats established earlier. The metrics will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the Project Team. Data will be captured and documented. This will require assigning certain individuals to gather, quantify, and document the data in a way that can quickly communicate the results. The data, once documented will be distributed and will provide information concerning the progress made toward achieving the goals established at the beginning. A schedule and data collection routine will be established so team members know when to expect certain types of information. In order to best understand the nuances of an operation, the results of every change must be quantified. In addition to the impact on the constraining operation, the impact from every change on downstream and upstream operations must be monitored. If a change does not create the desired effect, or if it creates more problems than it solves, the change needs to be quickly modified or reversed. It is important that as the Project Team focuses on the constraining point that this focus does not create other problems that negatively affect other parts of the company. The Project Team will learn not only how to take and report on the established metrics, they will also learn how to use the information to make adjustments to their actions in order to create positive change that impacts the performance of the whole company.
Part 2 Month 11 Reporting Results
The objective of this module is for the Project Teams to learn how to report on the results of their improvements and use these results to make recommendations concerning further action. The recommendations will be based on the level of success. If the increased capacity meets the company goal, the BOP ends and the Owner and the Leadership Team determine if new goals are to be set. If the new capacity does not meet company goals but meets the Management Team goals set for the department, the department is no longer the constraining department. The Project Team reports success to the Management Team and disbands. The Management Team revisits the workflow throughput of each department and determines the next constraining department. A new Project Team is formed associated with the new constraining department. The BOP repeats itself beginning with the new Project Team. The training of the new Project Team will either be facilitated by an outside facilitator or by those trained in the first pass of the process, or a combination of the two. How this is accomplished will depend on the company and the feelings of the Owner and Leadership Team with input from the Management Team. If the actions taken do not adequately improve the throughput of the department, the department remains the constraining department. The Project Team revisits the department workflow and determines the next constraining operation. The Project Team repeats the process of identifying the next constraint. The Project Team informs the Management Team of their decision. Regardless of the decision made at this point, the Management Team, with input and involvement from the Project Team, develops a presentation with recommendations and reasons for the recommendations, and presents these recommendations to the Leadership Team.
Part 2 Month 12 Executive Review
The objective of this module is to have the Leadership Team and the Owner learn how to receive the information from the Management Team, decipher the financial impact to the company’s business performance and identify what improved business capacity means for the future of the company. They will know how to apply other measurements to determine the overall benefits to the company including improvements in policies, procedures, employee skill levels and attitude, management and human resource systems, employee attitudes and work ethics, etc. This module is the formal and official close of the BOP. It is a post mortem of the process where the effectiveness of each module will be discussed. This will, in large part, be a refresher for the Owner and Leadership Team of the first several modules. It will recap the results of each module so that the Owner and the Leadership Team more fully understand how to use the BOP going forward. Any nuances of the company and its organization will be identified and the process will be tweaked as may be required to make it more tailored to the company for future applications. The Owner and the Leadership Team will determine the next step. Based on the needs of the Owner he or she may decide to use this process in a simpler form and apply its principals to ongoing continuous improvement efforts. The Owner may decide to launch a new initiative and repeat the process from the beginning. He or she may decide to use parts of the process to teach others within the organization about team work, problem solving through the use of teams, how to continuously monitor performance with the use of KPIs, etc. At the close of this module the Owner with input from the Leadership Team will decide how to use this process in the future.
The BOP is the combination of three management and leadership theories. The first is the Theory of Constraints. This theory states that the amount of output that an organization can produce is limited or constrained by the throughput at a single point, or at most two or three points, either internal or external to the organization. The focus is on finding the constraining point and changing it so it is no longer the constraining point. The output of the organization increases until constrained by the next constraining point. This theory holds that you can continually increase the output of an organization by continually focusing the efforts of the organization on finding and removing subsequent constraining points.
The second theory is Systems Theory as it applies to business organizations. This theory states that in order for anything to be produced, there must be a set of interrelated activities working together to accomplish an overall goal. The system is understood when the activities and how they interrelate are understood. Systems can only be improved by improving the activities within the system and how these activities are interrelated, or both.
The third theory is Transformational Leadership. This theory states that in order to transform an organization so it operates more effectively its people must believe that their tasks are important and they must work together in a collaborative spirit to effectively solve problems or create new ideas. This first requires the leader to have a vision that is articulated and understood throughout the organization. It also requires an operating structure that lets people know their importance to the whole organization and brings them together in synergistic teams to determine how to change the way the organization operates.
The first six modules are designed to create a culture that reinforces these three theories and have upper management see how they can be applied in a way that creates a highly productive and synergistic organization. These modules will allow the business Owner and his or her top managers to see some early results as the BOP helps them better understand their organization. A Leadership Team that will oversee the implementation of the BOP will be formed.
Business Optimization – Program Development
During the next six modules the program is expanded from the Owner and top management to the next level of management within the organization. This level of management learns the BOP and begins the activities to transform the company. They will be introduced to the three theories and how they apply to company organizations. They will learn the principals of these theories and will begin to apply what they learn to create the changes required to improve the performance of the company. A Management Team will be formed to further direct the efforts of the implementation process. The Management Team will form a Project Team whose focus will be implementing the change that will increase the company’s level of output. Both teams will learn how to function as synergistic teams and where to direct their efforts.
The technical aspects of the BOP use the Theory of Constraints and Systems Theory. The Management Team will use what they learn as they go through the development phase to understand the actual workings of the company. They will diagram how work flows through their company. They will learn how to focus their efforts and direct the Project Team on pin pointing where the constraint in the process is located and how this constraint affects the output of the business.
The human aspect of the BOP uses the Transformational Leadership Theory beginning with the Owner establishing a vision for the whole organization. The Leadership Team will understand the vision of the Owner and the direction of the company. They will form the Management Team whose charter will be defined. This team will learn the technical aspects and begin applying them as they increase their understanding of how the company operates.
The training will expand to include a second group of employees who are one level below the members of the Management Team. This group will form the Project Team and will learn about the three theories and how to apply their principals to delving deeper into understanding how their department works. This application of these principals will lead them to understand where the constraint is located.
At the end of these six modules there will be a select group of second and third level employees working in synergistic teams who are motivated and who have the skill set to work through the coming problem solving and idea generating section.
Business Optimization – Program Implementation
As the program moves into the Implementation Phase the company has been going through a subtle yet deliberate cultural shift. This shift has been created by the top three levels of employees in the company and how are effectively working in a collaborative effort. The foundation is in place to have the employees believe in the principals of the BOP and for them to be motivated to apply these principals. At this stage the employees are beginning to apply constraint and system thinking processes to improve the performance of the company.
During the next nine modules the BOP will be thoroughly understood and embraced by those in the company. The focus of these modules is to instill the vision and create further motivation and synergistic team work among all employees who are associated with the operation at the constraining point. The primary focus of these training efforts will be toward the Project Team and teaching them how to make and implement the correct decisions.
The concept of metrics will be introduced to the Project Team. This concept says that you cannot control anything you do not measure. This concept will be introduced during the first module of this section. The thrust behind this section will be focusing Project Team efforts on the operation at the constraining point. This team will learn how to establish metrics, techniques for problem solving, and how to apply these metrics and techniques to increase throughput at the constraining point.
The last module of this section will involve the Project Team and appropriate non-management personnel. This group of employees will make the change to the process at the constraining point in such a way that the change accomplishes what it is supposed to accomplish without disrupting critical business requirements. This session will culminate by bringing all the training and activities associated with the BOP together so that the goals set during the second module of the BOP are achieved.
Business Optimization – Program Review
The last three modules focus on evaluating the effectiveness of the BOP. The first module begins by having the group of employees who implemented the changes and the Project Team learn how to quantify the results. These results will be based on the level of throughput at the constraining point after the changes have been implemented. The new level of throughput will be verified and the theoretical maximum throughput will be determined.
The second module will involve the Project Team learning how to take the results quantified during the previous module and create a report that will be used to communicate these results to the Management Team. The report will identify the new capacity of the department in which the constraining point was located. It will also explain the process used to make the changes, which areas of the company were affected, the cost and benefit from the changes, and recommendations for further action.
The last module will be the culmination of all the previous modules. It will include the Owner, his or her top managers, the Leadership Team, the Management Team and the Project Team. This group will review the results and the recommendations reported from the Management Team. This group will be led through a process of verifying the cost and benefits of the process. They will do a post mortem of the process and identify areas that should be tweaked in order to use the process more effective in the future. At the end of this module the Owner will determine what the next step should be in order for the company to continue to improve.
This service is primarily available to the following industry sectors:
One of the most significant changes in the construction industry during the past 50 years has been the reduction in the time required from job conception of a project to job completion. This has been made possible by the advances in computer technology. Fifty years ago the idea of CAD was just becoming an economically useable technology. However, it was mostly limited to the larger corporations and its basic function was limited to drafting and producing assembly and construction drawings.
Fifty years ago drawings used for bid and construction documents were produced by hand on vellum and printed using blue print machines. The construction process starting with architectural design through construction and startup was a linear process with little opportunity to shorten the time it took to complete a construction project. Critical path thinking was just becoming popular as a way to shorten this time.
Critical path thinking and mapping identified the various sequences of events or paths that were required to complete a construction project. The path that required the most time became the critical path. Once the critical path was identified effort was placed on finding ways to reduce the time through this path. When critical path thinking first started it was based on hand developed diagrams that depicted all the various paths of activities including the critical path.
Other management tools were also gaining in use such as Gantt and Pert charts. They too were hand developed. Personal computers, laptops, cell phones, and tablets were in the distant future. There was no such thing as digital information or electronic transmission. If drawings were needed quickly, an engineer jumped on a plane with a set of drawings or the drawings were shipped overnight to the job site by the fastest means possible.
Another significant change over the past fifty years has been the increase in governmental oversight and regulatory influences. Fifty years ago OSHA did not exist nor did the EPA. These two regulatory influencers have significantly changed the way construction projects need to be structured and managed.
Due in large part to the nature of the beast, the industry as a whole has been slow to adopt newer technologies. Though material and construction techniques have advanced over the past fifty years, the industry is still, for the most part, focused on how best to make a profit on a project by project basis. There has been little incentive to invest in longer term productivity enhancements. One of the key reasons is the low margins and heavy competiveness that has been prevalent within the industry. This makes it difficult for companies to have the resources and interest to invest in longer term R&D. While labor productivity has increased in just about all other industries it has decreased by 20% over the last fifty years in the construction industry.
The industry is beginning to “wake up” to the fact that they need to seek after and embrace newer technologies and systems. Construction projects continue to incur costly mistakes when specifications are incorrect or when workers fail to follow installation instructions or drawings, or adhere to specification requirements. Problems also happen when jobs are scheduled so tightly that one trade gets ahead of another causing confusion and rework.
The fast paced, low margin and competitive nature of this industry coupled with traditional management techniques continues to challenge project management processes. Regardless of the efforts put into critical path technologies, construction processes still tend to be linear putting increasing pressure on companies to quickly estimate and bid jobs. This results in incomplete and missing critical details during planning and design. These missed details end up adding cost and schedule delays as projects progress.
There has been an onslaught of new and modified regulations making it expensive and time consuming for construction companies to stay up to date. As a result companies, due to needing to stay competitive, are forced to determine how far they should go in complying with regulatory requirements compared to how much punitive risk they are willing to take. Companies typically look at the probability of “getting caught” compared to the potential cost when they are caught before determining how much expense and effort they want to incur to ensure 100% compliance.
Though there are standardized construction processes, each project tends to stand on its own with its own set of designers, estimators, and project managers. Because of the competitive nature of this industry companies are reluctant to share their processes with other companies. This is also true with individuals because they do not want to share what they do or how they do it since this knowledge is perceived as a person’s competitive edge.
This competitive nature permeates the culture within the industry and affects the way architects and contractors work together and with their vendors. There is often little involvement from contractors and their suppliers in providing insight and technological input in designing constructing projects. Architects and design engineers tend to interpret specifications with little involvement from their various suppliers. This can result in poor or incorrect specifications, which can have costly and sometime catastrophic consequences.
The industry is currently facing labor shortages in many areas. As volume ramps up companies are finding it harder and more expensive to fine qualified trade labor. Due to the cyclical nature of the industry people are used to going from job to job and company to company. There is little loyalty on the part of management toward their employees and little loyalty toward a company from its employees. This makes finding and retaining skilled workers difficult, expensive and highly competitive.
The future outlook for the industry is positive and expected to grow 7 to 8% per year through 2020. Spending on all projects, from large civil infrastructure to small remodeling is forecast to surpass GDP growth for the foreseeable future. The growing interest in large infrastructure projects will only help in this area.
The labor challenges that companies are facing will continue to increase. During to the last twenty years high schools and junior colleges have moved away from teaching trade skills and, in many cases are steering students away from pursuing a career in construction. This has amplified the shortage of skilled trade labor. A growing number of younger people are losing interest in pursuing careers in construction this industry due to the cyclical nature of the industry and the lack of job security. The average age of workers are increasing. There are not enough younger people coming up behind the aging baby boomers to replace those who are either retiring or will be in the coming years.
Another challenge will be the growing difficulty in finding traditional financing for the capital required to grow. Construction companies tend to operate on low margins which make it hard to fund capital improvements out of operating profits. It also makes it difficult to invest in newer technologies that will be necessary to remain competitive in the coming years.
The traditional way where owners selected architects to design projects before sending out bid packages will continue to be challenged. It is time consuming and does not take advantage of the expertise of a contractor. The pressure to improve labor productivity and increase construction performance will put increasing pressure on companies to aggressively embrace newer technologies and processes including collaborative project delivery. This involves selecting a contractor at the same time an architect is selected. This allows the contractor to be involved in the design stage, which can have valuable input in the design and planning phases. This process is seeing benefits by reducing the overall time from project conception to project completion while reducing overall project costs and installation inefficiencies.
Another technology that will continue to increase is Building Information Modeling or BIM. BIM digitally incorporates three dimension designs that visibly depict a facility or other types of projects along with costs and time schedules. It is used from project conception through project completion and is utilized throughout all facets of project management and implementation. As this technology becomes more widely accepted costs will come down and technology will become simpler to use. An increasingly number of companies, other than just the largest ones will begin using this technology to stay competitive.
Manufacturing has seen significant changes during the past fifty years. The same processes that were developed by Ford using mass production and relatively simple supply chains were still the norm back in 1960s. These mass production techniques worked well when there were few product variations and a stable market demand and were instrumental in giving the United States the manufacturing capacity needed to supply the equipment and material to win World War II.
However, after the war things began to change. Japan focused on achieving world status as a manufacturer and began looking at ways to produce quality products that met the demands of a changing world. Out of these efforts came statistical process control, Just-in-Time, Kanban and flexible manufacturing. American manufacturers also needed to change as the consumer began demanding more variety of products with shorter delivery times.
As pressure to change mounted so did the need to have more predictable and responsive manufacturing systems. One of the areas that hampered the ability of manufacturers to efficiently meet consumer demand was within the supply chain prior to manufacturing. This was in large part due to the manually operated supply chain management processes which were not able to adequately respond to the growing dynamic nature of manufacturers.
Between the end of the war and the early 1970’s most manufacturing plants ran on manual planning, procurement and operational control systems. Digital computers were just beginning to make an impact and computer based planning, procurement and operating control systems were making their initial appearance.
These early computers were expensive and required a large amount of space in which to be housed. They also required expensive, technically competent personnel to program and maintain in order for them to effectively do their jobs. For these reasons the use of computers to control manufacturing processes was concentrated among the larger corporations.
Issues with supply chain problems continued to grow as did the ability of mathematicians and engineers to develop formulas that helped predict supply chain requirements. These changes led to the first major application of computers manufacturing processes in the early 1970’s with the introduction of Material Requirements Planning of MRP. These computing systems were fairly simple by today’s standards but were effective in early improvements in supply chain management.
The rapid development of digital computers and software led to the development of Computerized Numeric Controllers for machine shop type operations and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) for more of the process type operations. Both of these technologies simplified process control systems and led to the advancement of more integrated, automated, and responsive manufacturing.
Computer controlled processes, robots, supply chain management, product delivery and customer service systems have continued to improve and are now a critical component to all manufacturing companies.
The results from these manufacturing technologies have caused a significant increase in labor productivity worldwide. Productivity gains have allowed companies to greatly decrease the time it takes to conceptualize, design, produce and deliver products. It has also increased the need for manufacturing companies to continually improve the effectiveness and efficiencies of their manufacturing processes.
The focus on improving productivity, flexibility, responsiveness, and quality is ongoing. Increasing automation to improve product consistency and production efficiencies is a daily effort for most manufacturing companies. Since no one company can have expertise in all areas, more and more companies are beginning to more fully understand and focus on their core competencies. As a result an increasing number of companies are looking for ways to outsource those activities that do not fit these competencies.
There continues to be a focus on automation to improve labor efficiencies, reduce cycle times, and improve customer service and cash flow. Another focus is on outsourcing to improve capacity without increasing overhead or requiring large amounts of capital. Another strategy that a growing number of companies are using to increase efficiencies is through mergers, acquisitions and the forming of strategic alliances.
Reshoring is a buzzword that refers to larger manufacturers bringing their manufacturing, or at least some of their manufacturing back to their native country. The reason why companies are reshoring is that landed costs are increasing, economic order quantities are larger, and response and lead times are longer for factories that are further from the end consumer. Reshoring is also gaining in popularity because of growing nationalism for products that are made in one’s native country.
The need for skilled labor and adequate capital continues to be a major challenge to even the best of manufacturing companies. Over all labor shortages, especially in higher skilled individuals, is hurting a large number of companies. The technical requirements of operating modern day plants are increasing faster than the skill levels of their employees. This is especially true for older employees. There is also a challenge with the younger employees who have different values and work ethics than older ones.
The manufacturing industry is expected to continue to grow and improve. Economies are improving as is the demand for products, from large capital equipment to everyday household items.
Capital investments are increasing and new technologies such as 3-D printing and rapid prototyping are becoming more economical and user friendly. Integrated digital systems that manage the processes beginning with product conception through to delivery to the customer continue to improve in cost and function. These improvements will continue and manufacturers will continue to invest in these technologies.
The demand for better products, more variety, and quicker delivery times will continue to increase the need for sophisticated supply chain management processes. The need for more automation and automatic data gathering and information management processes will expand. This will continue to put pressure on manufacturers to invest in updated systems and employee skill levels.
China, and other lower cost economies, will continue to see their costs rise as labor becomes more expensive and as the standard of living continues to improve in these countries. This will increase the incentive to re-shore as more manufacturers look at relocating some or all of their factories back to North America.
The forgoing will create increased opportunities for smaller, domestic manufacturers. However, many of these companies do not have highly sophisticated management and process systems. This will need to change. Whether they are small independent companies or contract manufactures for other larger companies they will need to better integrate their processes with those of other companies. This will likely require some paradigm shifts within the management of these companies in order for them to be able to rethink the way their companies operate.
Food & Beverage
The Food & Beverage Industry began shifting in the late 19th century as more and more people moved from rural areas to urban areas. This shift puts people further from food sources without the ability to grow their own food. Emerging technologies such as commercial canning and refrigeration, along with improving transportation allowed food to last longer and created a growing food processing and distribution industry.
As this industry grew so did the number of unethical businesses that created subpar and even dangerous foods. The concern grew resulting in the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 which focused on maintaining standard weights and the inspection of exports.
As the volume of processed foods increased so did the need to ensure that these foods were safe to the consumer. The FDA, which was the culmination of early groups within the Federal government, came into existence in 1930. The rapid increase in processed foods created an increasing need to preserve foods which led to a rapid expansion of preservatives and preserving technologies. This led to Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act which became law in 1937.
The need to preserve and enhance the tastes of foods rapidly increased as food companies ramped up production to supply military forces during World War II. This led to an increase in the use of chemical preservatives and additives. It also led to a rapid increase in R & D which developed processes to dehydrate juices and make instant coffee and cake mixes.
Prior to the war most foods were locally grown and sold through local markets, commercial canning was concentrated around fruits, vegetables and meats, and refrigeration was becoming a popular method to store food. There were also a growing number of packaged dry grains and cereals coming onto the market. The supermarket concept was starting to come on the scene with each store having an average of about 1,000 items.
After the war the demand for packaged, convenient, and ready to eat dinners with longer shelf life increased as solders returned from the war. As the post war economy grew housewives began looking for easier ways to prepare meals. This demand continued to put pressure on food producers to provide more processed foods with longer shelf life, which resulted in a growing use of food additives to enhance flavor, improve color and increase shelf life.
In conjunction with the growing amount of processed foods was a growing concern about food additives and potential harmful or adverse effects from eating processed foods. These concerns were increased by illnesses and even deaths from food borne contamination and led to the passage of the Food Additive Act of 1958. This Act forced producers to prove the safety of the additives they used.
As the world population grows and as the number of growers declines, the need to provide healthy, safe and nutritious foods with longer shelf lives will increase. Growing, processing, and distribution technologies continue to improve. This is increasing competitive pressures on companies within the food and beverage industries.
Consumer-accepted preservation and taste enhancement technologies continue to be a critical ingredient in the production of foods and beverages. Technologies such as nitrogen flushing, irradiation and genetically modified organisms as well as traditional canning, dehydration and freezing techniques are continually evaluated by the consuming public.
The consumer is becoming more educated about what is and what is not healthy. This increase in consumer awareness continues to impact the technologies food processors use to produce their food products. Technological improvements are important in growing and raising food products, and for controlling manufacturing processes. They are critical in controlling the distribution of food products. It is becoming more important to the consumer that quality products arrive in a time effective manner at reasonable prices. This is a highly competitive industry that demands both quality and cost efficiency to be successful. The challenge that food processing companies face is to do this better than their competition and on a consistent basis.
Though the larger companies dominate this industry and produce over half of the industry profits, smaller companies tend to be more efficient in local markets. They do this by creating products that are better aligned with local tastes. One of the key issues with these smaller companies is the lack of capital and resources that are available to the larger companies. This puts financial pressure on these smaller companies and hampers their ability to compete directly against the larger ones. Smaller are reacting by being better able to respond quickly to shifts in market trends even when limited technologically.
The whole supply chain from growing produce to selling food products at the retail level will continue to be highly competitive with relatively lower profit margins than other industries. This will continue to challenge these types of companies to achieve the profit levels needed to generate a healthy return on investment. These challenges are compounded by the heavy dependence on energy and the cost of transportation, which is volatile from time to time. In addition to these challenges the changing demographics being created by the aging baby boomers and the growth of millennials will significantly change the way companies need to conduct business in the future.
Changing in demographics will not only create uncertainties and disrupters within traditional business models but will also create exciting opportunities for companies that are attuned to consumer trends or are able to react fast enough to changes in these trends. Consumers will continue to become increasingly interested in, aware of and concerned with nutrition. People will continue to want to know the raw ingredients and additives that make up the food product and the affects these will have on their bodies. This will continue to create a shift toward natural ingredients ready-to-drink teas and carbonated water and away from soda drinks and artificial ingredients. There will also continue to be an increased interest in protein and protein alternatives from unique sources such as seaweed.
The growing demand for variety along with natural and organic foods without artificial preservatives will put increasing pressure on distribution channels. Consumers will be increasingly concerned about artificial ingredients but will continue to demand extended shelf life on products. This will continue to be a growing a challenge food processors.
Regulatory pressure is also expected to continue, especially in the area of labeling. The consumer is demanding more knowledge of what they are consuming, which puts pressure on companies and government regulators to insure transparent labeling.
The changing demographic addressed earlier will create new demands on food processors as they try to stay ahead of, or quickly react to the younger consumer who tend to go quickly from fad to fad. These changes bode well for the smaller private producers and labelers because they tend to be more niche focused, closer to the consumer and able to quickly react to trends in the market.
The CPG industry has obviously gone through very significant changes over the past fifty to sixty years as product, manufacturing, distribution, marketing and advertising technologies have improved and as consumer demands have changed. Starting back to the 1950’s as the number of households with TVs began to increase significantly the focus was still on mass producing products and “pushing” these products into the market through the growing types of advertising media. The emphasis on pushing products to the consumer shifted during the 1960’s to pushing images or impressions created by the products that consumers purchased. During the 1970’s the focus continued to be pushing the products into the marketplace but with the effort shifting to positioning a product to be more prominent, better priced and more available